Samarkand is a city in Uzbekistan (Focal Asia). It is situated at the foot of the Alai Mountains, at a height of 720 meters. In the southeast, 400 km away, are the renowned Pamir mountains. Samarkand was referred to the old Greeks as “Marakanda”, being popular for the ripe plain “Zarashon”, referred to by the Greeks as “Polytimetos”. The city [… ]
Samarkand is a city in Uzbekistan (Focal Asia). It is situated at the foot of the Alai Mountains, at a height of 720 meters. In the southeast, 400 km away, are the renowned Pamir mountains.
Samarkand was referred to the old Greeks as “Marakanda”, being renowned for the fruitful plain “Zarashon”, referred to by the Greeks as “Polytimetos”. The city was established by the Persians, and in 329 BC the fortification was vanquished by Alexander the Incomparable. Under Muslim rule, the city’s improvement was quick, particularly under the Persian rule of the Samanid line. The Mongols under the authority of Ginghis Khan obliterate the city in 1220. Under the rule of the Mongol Khan Timur Lenk, Samarkand turns into the capital of his realm. In 1925, the city turned into the capital of Uzbekistan, the capital was subsequently moved to Tashkent.
For what reason did I make this presentation? Since, in a 1903 photograph taken in Samarkand (Uzbekistan), a few archeologists should be visible remaining before a sort of “star door”! This door is perhaps of the most extraordinary relic I have at any point seen. It seems as though something taken from a science fiction film or as though it comes from another aspect! (Coincidentally, do you recall the science fiction series “Stargate ” ? )
Sadly, the “star door” is presently not in that frame of mind on the planet, however it is conceivable that it wound up in a confidential assortment. Then again, take a gander at the characters on the edges of the door… Comparative characters can likewise be viewed as in the “Stargate” series ! Were the makers of this series roused by this strange revelation?
Where could the ancient rarity presently be? What’s more, for what reason did they conceal it?
PS On the Web, this photograph caused some conversation. Some accept that the image is phony, for example controlled.
In any case, until there is exceptionally obvious evidence that she was “photoshopped”, we need to give her credit.